Comparison
ScanAble vs Lighthouse
Updated
Google Lighthouse includes an accessibility audit as part of its broader web performance toolkit. ScanAble is purpose-built for accessibility compliance. Both use axe-core under the hood, but they serve different needs.
Feature comparison
| Feature | ScanAble | Lighthouse |
|---|---|---|
| Focus | Accessibility-only (deep) | Performance + SEO + a11y + PWA (broad) |
| WCAG coverage | WCAG 2.2 AA + best practices (full axe ruleset) | Subset of axe-core rules (~40 checks) |
| Compliance score | Weighted by severity (0-100) | Percentage of passing audits (0-100) |
| Fix instructions | Detailed per-violation with code context | Generic descriptions with links |
| PDF report | Verified, timestamped PDF ($49) | No (HTML/JSON export only) |
| API access | REST API with key auth and metering | CLI only (no hosted API) |
| CI/CD integration | API call in any CI | Lighthouse CI (separate tool) |
| Price | Free tier (100/mo) + paid plans | Free (open source) |
| Additional audits | Accessibility only | Performance, SEO, PWA, best practices |
Pricing comparison
| Tier | ScanAble | Lighthouse |
|---|---|---|
| Basic use | Free (100 scans/mo) | Free (unlimited) |
| CI/CD integration | $19/mo (1,000 scans) | Free (self-hosted) |
| Bulk scanning | $49-149/mo (5K-25K scans) | Free (self-hosted) |
Try ScanAble free
Scan any URL for WCAG 2.2 violations. Free preview with compliance score — no signup required.
Scan My Website Free